If persons are relations of a simple essence,
* How does such a relation become incarnate?
* Does this relation have a relation to the human nature?
* If two (or three) of the persons are relations, then are there relations between the relations? How does this not entail gnosticism with its endlessly multiplied hypostases?
I suppose one could get around this by saying that the term “relation” takes on a different meaning (albeit with no warning).
2 thoughts on “Relations of relations”
I’m usually disappointed with Reformed trinitarian theolegoumena because it so heavily depends upon Augustine, who was a disaster. Which Reformed theologians best got away from the Augustinian heritage, or sufficiently repackaged it, in your opinion? With the exception of Torrance.
Though Robert Letham’s book on the Trinity is flawed, he at least sees the problem. Colin Gunton is too much of a Barthian, but he, too, sees the problem with Augustine.
At the end of the day the best Reformed Trinitarian theology is Torrance.