One of the criticisms of some Kuyperians is that they read Covenantal relations into the Trinity, and if that’s true, then there is historical development in the Trinity. Obviously, that’s wrong.
But of course there are covenantal relations in the Trinity. What’s the Covenant of Redemption all about, anyway? I don’t think that’s the problem. The problem seems to be the claim that the Trinity is the pattern for Covenantal thinking. Well, why wouldn’t it be? The Trinity is the source of all good theology. Think about it: if the Trinity isn’t the source of all good theology, then where did covenantal relations come from? We are now on the edge of ontological dualism.
Har Mo'Ed 